CEFRO‘zbekcha

CEFR Writing C1 namuna: bitta mavzu, B2 va C1 matn tahlili

CEFR Writing C1 namuna: Multilevel 2-qism uchun forum posti, xuddi shu mavzudagi B2 matn, rasmiy mezon bo‘yicha farqlar jadvali va 6 gapli mashq javoblari…

Ikki qo‘lida ikkita ochiq varaqni ushlab, ularni solishtirayotgan ayol

Multilevel Writing’da C1 aynan 2-qismda tekshiriladi: onlayn nashr uchun 180–200 so‘zli blog post, forum posti yoki maqola. Rasmiy mezonga ko‘ra 5 ball (C1) uchun pozitsiya aniq va izchil asoslangan, uslub janrga to‘liq mos, murakkab grammatika xilma-xil, punktuatsiya va imlo xatosiz, lug‘at keng, bog‘lovchilar esa “xilma-xil va noyob” bo‘lishi kerak. 4 ball (yuqori B2) matnda ham pozitsiya va argument bor, lekin murakkab tuzilmalar “bir qancha”, lug‘at “yetarli”.

Farqni tushunishning eng tez yo‘li — bitta mavzuda ikki matnni yonma-yon o‘qish. Quyida bir xil fikrlar bilan yozilgan B2 va C1 matn, rasmiy mezon bo‘yicha jadval, gapma-gap tahlil va mashq bor. Ikkala matn va topshiriq BandMate tahririyati tomonidan mashq uchun yozilgan, rasmiy test materiali emas.

Rasmiy talablar: 2-qism

Agentlikning 2025-yil oktyabrda e’lon qilingan yozish bo‘limi tafsilotlariga ko‘ra: daraja C1, hajm 180–200 so‘z, topshiriq matni 30–50 so‘z va muhokama qilinadigan fikr yoki savolni o‘z ichiga oladi, bo‘limga jami 60 daqiqa (2-qismga taxminan 35 daqiqa tavsiya etiladi). Baholash 0–6 ballik shkalada: 5 ball uchun C1 darajadagi matn, 6 ball esa C1 dan yuqori natija uchun. Janrlar farqi va 35 daqiqalik ish tartibi Multilevel Writing Essay sahifasida.

Mashq topshirig‘i

A city discussion forum asks: “Should old mahalla houses in city centres be replaced with modern apartment blocks?” Write a post giving your opinion and supporting it with examples. Write 180–200 words.

B2 versiya (185 so‘z, sarlavhasiz)

Should old houses make way for new flats?

Many people in our city are discussing whether old mahalla houses in the centre should be replaced with modern apartment blocks. In my opinion, this is sometimes necessary, but it should not happen everywhere.

Firstly, new buildings have clear advantages. A lot of old houses have problems with heating, water and electricity, and families who live there often suffer in winter. Modern flats are warmer and safer, and they can give homes to more people on the same land. For example, my cousin moved from an old house to a new flat last year, and now her children have their own rooms and a warm bathroom.

However, there are also disadvantages. When a mahalla is demolished, people lose their neighbours and the traditions they shared. Old streets also make the city look unique, and tourists come to see them, not the new glass towers.

In conclusion, I think the city should repair old houses where it is possible and build new flats only where the houses are in very bad condition. This way, people can have better homes and the city can keep its character.

C1 versiya (186 so‘z, sarlavhasiz)

New towers or old courtyards?

Walk through almost any central district of Tashkent and you will find a mahalla of low houses standing in the shadow of a new apartment block. Whether one should simply replace the other is, in my view, far less straightforward than it seems.

There is no denying that many older homes are in a poor state. Families who spend every winter battling leaking roofs and unreliable heating can hardly be blamed for welcoming a warm, well-built flat. Denser housing also makes far better use of scarce land in a city whose population keeps growing.

What worries me, however, is how much is lost when an entire neighbourhood disappears at once. A mahalla is not merely a collection of buildings; it is a network of people who attend each other’s weddings, look after each other’s children and organise hashar together. Such ties, built over generations, cannot simply be rebuilt on the fourteenth floor.

Rather than choosing between bulldozers and neglect, cities could renovate streets that are still sound and reserve redevelopment for houses beyond repair. Handled this way, modernisation need not come at the cost of community.

Rasmiy mezon bo‘yicha solishtirish

Chap ustunda agentlikning baholash mezonlaridan qisqartirilgan tavsif (4 ball → 5 ball).

MezonB2 matn (4 ball tavsifiga yaqin)C1 matn (5 ball tavsifiga yaqin)
Pozitsiya va argument: “aniq pozitsiya” → “to‘liq va izchil yoritilgan”Pozitsiya bor, ikki tomon sanab o‘tilgan, lekin argumentlar bir-biriga bog‘lanmaganHar paragraf oldingisidan kelib chiqadi; xulosa ikki tomonni birlashtiradi
Uslub: forum/blog uchun publitsistik uslubTo‘g‘ri, lekin essega o‘xshash qoliplar: Firstly, In conclusionO‘quvchini sahnaga olib kiradi: Walk through… and you will find
Grammatika: “bir qancha murakkab” → “xilma-xil murakkab, ko‘plab”Ergash gaplar, should be replaced, where it is possiblecan hardly be blamed for, What worries me is…, Handled this way, need not
Lug‘at: “yetarli” → “keng qamrovli va xilma-xil”problems, advantages, disadvantages, very bad conditionbattling leaking roofs, scarce land, beyond repair, redevelopment
Bog‘lovchilar: “mavjud” → “xilma-xil va noyob, ustalik bilan”Firstly, However, For example, In conclusion, This wayThere is no denying that, however gap ichida, Such ties, Rather than
Punktuatsiya va imlo: “kam sonli xato” → “xatosiz”Xato yo‘qXato yo‘q; nuqtali vergul to‘g‘ri ishlatilgan

Ikki muhim kuzatuv. Birinchidan, B2 matnda xato yo‘q, lekin u baribir B2. C1 uchun xatosizlik yetarli emas, qamrov kerak. Ikkinchidan, C1 matn uzunroq emas: ikkalasi ham 185 so‘z atrofida. Farq so‘zlar sonida emas, har gapning qancha ish bajarishida.

Gapma-gap: nima o‘zgardi

B2 gapC1 gapUsul
Many people in our city are discussing whether…Walk through almost any central district… and you will find…Umumiy kirish o‘rniga manzara; buyruq mayli + and shart ma’nosida
In my opinion, this is sometimes necessary, but……is, in my view, far less straightforward than it seems.Qat’iy “ha/yo‘q” o‘rniga nuansli pozitsiya
families who live there often suffer in winterFamilies who spend every winter battling leaking roofs…Umumiy fe’l (suffer) o‘rniga aniq manzara
However, there are also disadvantages.What worries me, however, is how much is lost…Bo‘sh o‘tish gapi o‘rniga fikrni olib keluvchi cleft gap
people lose their neighbours and the traditions they sharednot merely a collection of buildings; it is a network of people who…not merely… ; it is… — ta’rifni kengaytirish
In conclusion, I think the city should repair…Rather than choosing between bulldozers and neglect, cities could…Xulosa qolipsiz; ikki noto‘g‘ri yo‘lni rad etib, uchinchisini taklif qilish

Diqqat qiling: C1 matnda hashar, mahalla kabi mahalliy so‘zlar ishlatilgan, lekin kontekst ularni tushuntiradi (organise hashar together). Bu “madaniy tafsilot” matnni jonli qiladi, bironta tushunarsiz joy qoldirmaydi.

C1 ga intilayotganda Writing ballini tushiradigan 4 odat

  • Murakkab so‘zni noto‘g‘ri joyga qo‘yish. “The problem of housing is very multifaceted phenomenon” — artikl tushib qolgan va fikr bo‘sh. Mezon C1 da “biroz noo‘rin so‘z”ga yo‘l qo‘yadi, lekin grammatik xato va ma’nosiz gap boshqa narsa. To‘g‘ri: Housing is a complex problem.
  • Bog‘lovchi to‘plash. Moreover, furthermore, in addition ketma-ket uch gapda — bu “xilma-xil” emas, qolip. C1 matnda bog‘lanish ko‘pincha so‘zsiz: Such ties… oldingi gapga ishora qiladi.
  • Ruscha va o‘zbekcha qoliplar. “In our days” → These days; “It gives possibility” → It makes it possible; “The most part of people” → Most people.
  • Hajmdan chiqish. 250 so‘z yozib, Part 1 ga vaqt qoldirmaslik. Rasmiy hajm 180–200.

Mashq: B2 gapni C1 ga ko‘taring

Har bir gapni ma’nosini saqlab, qamrovliroq qilib qayta yozing.

  • 1. Many people think that public transport is bad, but it is getting better.
  • 2. Online shopping is very popular because it is easy.
  • 3. If the government builds more parks, people will be healthier.
  • 4. It is a big problem that young people cannot buy flats.
  • 5. Some people say exams are not fair. I partly agree with them.
  • 6. In conclusion, both sides have good points.

Javoblar (namuna)

  • 1. Although public transport still has a poor reputation, it has improved considerably in recent years. — Although bilan qarama-qarshilik, aniq fe’l improved considerably.
  • 2. The appeal of online shopping lies largely in its convenience. — fikrni ot bilan ifodalash (appeal, convenience).
  • 3. Were the government to invest in more parks, public health would almost certainly benefit. — inversiyali shart gap va ehtiyotkor baho.
  • 4. What concerns many young people most is that owning a flat is increasingly out of reach. — cleft gap va out of reach iborasi.
  • 5. While exams are not a perfect measure of ability, I would argue that they are fairer than many alternatives. — qisman rozilik, asoslangan pozitsiya.
  • 6. Ultimately, the strongest solution may lie in combining the best of both approaches. — qolipsiz xulosa, ehtimollik (may).

Boshqa javoblar ham to‘g‘ri bo‘lishi mumkin. Tekshirish uchun: gap tabiiy o‘qiladimi, ma’no saqlanganmi va murakkab tuzilma xatosizmi? Bog‘lovchilarning kengroq ro‘yxati linking words sahifasida.

Bu balllar sertifikatda nimani anglatadi

2-qism 0–6 ballik shkalada, butun Writing esa 16 ball ekspert bahosidan 0–75 ga o‘tkaziladi. Masalan, 1.1 da 4, 1.2 da 4 va 2-qismda 5 ball jami 13 — rasmiy jadvalda 63. Hisob va barcha chegaralar Multilevel ball jadvali sahifasida. 60 daqiqani uch topshiriqqa bo‘lish rejasi Multilevel writing rejasida.

Yozishdan oldin fikrni BandMate’da gapirib ko‘rish

BandMate yozma ishni Multilevel mezoni bo‘yicha baholamaydi. Lekin C1 matnning kuchi fikrlar orasidagi bog‘lanishda, bu esa og‘zaki ham mashq qilinadi: BandMateda Bandi bilan mavzuni 3 daqiqa muhokama qiling, qarshi fikrni ovoz chiqarib rad etishga urinib ko‘ring, keyin eng kuchli ikki dalilni rejaga yozing.

Manbalar

BandMate’ni Google’da afzal manba qiling